From a philosophical point of view their is nothing right or wrong. We usually judge a particular thing as right or wrong depending on whether we feel happy or guilty(sad,regretful etc) respectively about that particular thing... however, these feelings are nothing more than a set of biochemical reactions taking place inside our body.. these reactions can be boiled down to the motion of molecules, atoms, electrons and so on. This motion is again judged by the laws of mechanics…See More

There is a way to escape the inference of superluminal speeds and spooky action at a distance. But it (Superdeterminism) involves absolute determinism in the universe, the complete absence of free will. Suppose the world is super-deterministic, with not just inanimate nature running on behind-the-scenes clockwork, but with our behavior, including our belief that we are free to choose to do one experiment rather than another, absolutely predetermined, including the "decision" by the experimenter…See More

In the view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limitedhuman mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there isno God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for supportof such view.We know nothing about [God and the world] at all. All our knowledge is but the knowledge of school children. Possible we shall know a little more than we do now. But the real nature of things, that we shall never know, never.I see a pattern, but my imagination cannot picture…See More

I faxed Eugenie C. Scott my Open Letter regarding Ernst Mayr’s first step in natural selection (“everything is a matter of chance”), but I haven’t heard from her. I am not sure of the reason for her lack of response, but I don’t think she can show how such a statement qualifies as science. If she can, I am very receptive.According to Carl Sagan, science is based on "experimental results, data, observations, measurements, 'facts.'" How does “everything is a matter of chance” fit that…See More